Posted 20 hours ago

Systematic Theology: The Complete Three Volumes

ZTS2023's avatar
Shared by
Joined in 2023

About this deal

Dogmatic Theology is, when rightly cultivated, as truly a Biblical and as truly an inductive science as its younger sister. From 1854 until his death in 1878, he served as Professor of Exegetical, Didactic, and Polemic Theology. So of course, as is made obvious by a cursory reading of the material, Hodge insists on the importance of taking into account the situation of the interpreter.

He views Biblical Theology as a part of Exegetical Theology which deals with the revelation of God in its historical continuity and stresses its organic character. After he graduated from Princeton in 1819, he served in pulpit supply for about a year and then he was back in 1820 at Princeton as a professor, and he stayed there right up until his death of 1878. From this it was inferred that He could not have had a finite intelligence, but that the Logos was clothed in Him with a human body with its animal life. Biblical Theology is not, then, a rival of Systematics; it is not even a parallel product of the same body of facts, provided by exegesis; it is the basis and source of Systematics. We can draw inferences from them, as Hodge shows from this example: ‘It is a fact that the Scriptures attribute omniscience to Christ.

As Hodge proceeds to show, collecting together the facts of Scripture is not like collecting pebbles from a beach and sorting them. Hodge's inductive method betrays certain tell-tale marks of its time, though this alone is hardly an argument against it. Charles Hodge (1797–1878) was one of nineteenth-century America’s leading theologians, owing in part to a lengthy teaching career, voluminous writings, and a faculty post at one of the nation’s most influential I rather fancy that Hodge, who was something of a Bible commentator, was appraised of the different literary forms of the Scripture, capable of distinguishing between parables, narratives and wisdom literature, and the literal from the metaphorical.

Unfortunately, Professor Vanhoozer's negative comments about Charles Hodge's systematic theological method are not novel. In divine revelation word and fact are always connected; it does not merely convey facts that we have to explain, but it itself clearly illumines those facts. Hodge sold her home there in Philadelphia, took their remaining assets, and bought a large home in Princeton, and decided to take in boarders as a way to have income; and off Charles went to Princeton.Unique among systematic theologies, the last two volumes are almost entirely devoted to sanctification, covering topics like contentment, self-denial, patience, and prayer. The arguments for historic theology of the Reformed theology are sound and give a fair presentation of contrary thought.

There is a table over there' is 'laden' with the theory of the spatio-temporal location of middle-sized artifacts. Thirdly, that in virtue of the first and second of these practices Hodge focuses on revealed content of the Bible and is predisposed to construe that content as propositional teaching. But Hodge can only make the important distinction between the principles that we may wrongly bring to Scripture and the principles which we may rightly take from Scripture, by making a distinction between principles and facts.When the usual charges are leveled against Hodge, but this time from a highly-regarded theologian in the Reformed family then it's high time to set the record straight.

As for the scientific elaboration of this God-given material, this must be held to lie beyond the Biblical period.In other words, unlike pebbles on a beach, the facts of Scripture, expressed in the sentences and clauses of the Bible, have semantic and syntactic meaning. His three-volume magnum opus, Systematic Theology, was published in 1872-73, and confirmed him as the outstanding Calvinistic systematic theologian of the nineteenth century. There is a table over there' is 'laden' with the theory of the spatio-temporal location of middle-sized artefacts. It is alleged that this approach, besides having a primitive view of scientific method, does not make sufficient allowance for context, or presupposition, or for having due regard to the organic character of Scripture.

Asda Great Deal

Free UK shipping. 15 day free returns.
Community Updates
*So you can easily identify outgoing links on our site, we've marked them with an "*" symbol. Links on our site are monetised, but this never affects which deals get posted. Find more info in our FAQs and About Us page.
New Comment